Lascaux cave art

Lascaux cave art

Monday, May 22, 2017

A Dream of the Ancestors and the Mask of Odin

Last night, quite unusual for me I dreamed almost constantly, waking up, going back to sleep and dreaming again, one after the other, even dreams within dreams. Shortly before waking I had a dream which involved me talking to a dead ancestor. It was impressed upon me that this was a great grandfather. The ancestor did not reveal to me his name but I was trying to work out who he was by the process of mental deduction. The name of the person which was impressed upon me however was that of a great great grandfather so it is possible that the term 'great grandfather' in the dream was not to be taken literally. It was evident to me in the dream that he was dead but yet he appeared alive just as you and I are and his cosy cottage was situated (in the dream) just a few houses away from me so I was conscious that he was always close by. I do not recall what we talked about but he made himself known to me.

It does not surprise me that I dreamed about an ancestor as I am engaged in researching my ancestry which I am sure will become a life long project! It is also not unusual for the dead to appear in our dreams for the ancients considered that in the dream state, especially before waking we are more receptive to the spirits of the dead and can communicate with them as we do with the living. Frequently the shades of departed relatives appear to me in dreams and I am very conscious that they are dead. On occasions I have had dreams in which people who I am not aware have passed on reveal themselves to me to tell me the news! This was the case with my half sister in Germany who passed on a few years ago. 

Immediately after leaving my ancestor's cottage I encountered another dead person, this time my daughter's maternal great grandfather. I asked him to make an engraving on a piece of wood for me, just a bare outline as I knew that he had good practical skills. When he came back, to my surprise I found that he had completed the entire job for me, not just the outline and it turned out to be a carving of a mask of Odin! At this point I awoke. I am not sure what this all means and I am still processing the information but I will edit or add to this article on an ongoing basis. Any interpretations from my readers would be welcome.

Monday, May 01, 2017

Reverence for the Gods

Whilst listening to an interesting BBC radio programme today on regarding the Odinist or Asatru religion in modern day Iceland I was struck by certain comments made by a female practitioner who seems to regards the Gods as being 'equal' to man. This is not the first time that I have encountered this particular perspective and in my opinion it is an inappropriate way to think of our deities.

Many years ago when I was still a xtian I encountered many types of xtians from various denominations and churches and I found that there were two ways in which xtians encountered their god. There was the High Church approach in the Church of England which focussed on ritual and reverence for the xtian god and then at the other end of the spectrum there was the Low Church element which is largely free of ritual and which is also to be found in Non-Conformist denominations. One thing that struck me as rather odd was the practice of some churchgoers, especially the younger ones to actually dress down when going to the 'house of god'; something which I have never understood and at the time considered to be a lack of respect, a lack of awe, a lack of reverence.

One sees this casual approach amongst some heathens today and each time I hear that man is the 'equal to the Gods' I feel rather uneasy about such a statement. If we are the 'equal' of the Gods then why do we worship or honour them? Some would say that the Gods should be viewed in the same way as we view human parents and to a certain extent I understand and in part agree with this sentiment and statement. However the way in which children relate to their parents today in the 'western' world is not a traditional one and is often lacking in respect. Many former xtians, particularly the younger ones take this attitude into heathenism and are quite casual in how they approach the Gods. If we are to expect a great heathen revival then we must examine how we view the Gods that we say that we honour or worship. By the way there is nothing at all wrong with worshipping the Gods. Prayer and worship are not confined to or restricted to the alien Abrahamic religions.

A genuine heathen perspective of the Gods must be rooted in how our ancestors related to them. We may have changed but the Gods have not! One particular clue is to be found in Tacitus' Germania:

"As for gods, Mercury is the one they worship most, and on certain days they think it right to propitiate him with human victims. Hercules and Mars they appease with lawful animals." (9.1, translation by J.B. Rives)

So as my readers can see the worship of the Gods was not a casual affair but something which was taken seriously and in great earnest. There was a desire to please the Gods and sacrifice was seen as a way of doing this. I would like to point out that I am not advocating this practice today although it may be something which is taken up again once the decaying 'New World Order' is finally brought to its knees. What else can we learn from the above passage? Well Mercury who the Romans equated with Woden/Wodan/Wotan "is the one they worship most". This is as it should be for He is THE High Lord of the Teutons. Hercules (Thunor/Thunar/Donar) and Mars (Tiw) were also worshipped but in this case with animals rather than humans. One may speculate here how men were offered to Woden but it seems clear to me that this was by hanging and often this was done at a crossroads. Odin was known as Hangatyr and Hangagud, the God of the hanged. Woden would come and commune with the dead and dying. He like Mercury is the great psychopomp, the conveyor of human souls to the afterlife.

Some may baulk at the concept of human sacrifice but I think this is more to do with the lingering effects of the xtian religion which created the concept of 'sin' and its bedmate 'guilt'. We see this today with the modern religion of the 'holocaust' and the very profitable industry centred around it. Another translation of Germania 9 puts across what I am trying to say more clearly:

"Above all other gods they worship Mercury, and count it no sin, on certain feast-days, to include human victims in the sacrifices offered to him. Hercules and Mars they appease by offerings of animals, in accordance with ordinary civilized custom." (Translation by H. Mattingley and revised by S.A. Handford)

The Germanic tribe which Germania 9 is discussing are the Suebi. This tribe is referred to later on in Germania 39.1:

"The Semnones relate that they are the oldest and noblest of the Suebi. Confidence in their antiquity is confirmed by their cult. At a set time, the peoples who share that name and bloodline send embassies to assemble in a forest hallowed by ancestral auguries and ancient dread, and by slaying a man on behalf of the people they begin the barbaric celebration of their fearful rites." (Rives)
"The oldest and most famous of the Suebi; it is said, are the Semnones, and their antiquity is confirmed by a religious observance. At a set time, deputations from all the tribes of the same stock gather in a grove hallowed by the auguries of their ancestors and by immemorial awe. The sacrifice of a human victim in the name of all marks the grisly opening of their savage ritual." (Mattingley/Handford)
The above passage is quite illuminating. Once again we encounter the reference to human sacrifice but notice here the emotions that are engendered by the Semnones: "ancient dread" and "immemorial awe". The Gods are not to be approached lightly and certainly not as 'equals' for they embody great elemental forces, particularly Woden and Thunor and thus this in itself must demand a certain respect.

There is a great deal of speculation as to who the main deity of the Semnones alluded to in Germania is:
"They revere this grove in other ways too: no one enters unless bound by a shackle, as an inferior who makes manifest the might of the divine. If by chance he stumbles, it is not lawful to lift himself up and rise: they roll out over the ground. On that place their entire superstition is centred, as though from there the tribe has its origin, as though there the god is ruler of all, and the remainder subordinate and submissive." (39.2, Rives)

"Bound by a shackle" or as the earlier Mattingley translation puts it, "bound with a cord". That sounds to me like the noose of the hanged, the torc worn by the Woden initiates!

"Another observance shows their reverence for this grove. No one may enter it unless he is bound with a cord, by which he acknowledges his own inferiority and the power of the deity. Should he chance to fall, he may not raise himself or get up again, but must roll out over the ground. The grove is the centre of their whole religion. It is regarded as the cradle of the race and the dwelling-place of the supreme god to whom all things are subject and obedient." (Mattingley translation)

"Reverence for this grove". This is the right frame of mind in which we must approach the Gods. Indeed unlike the woman speaking in the BBC documentary our ancestors did not believe themselves to be 'equal' to the Gods: quite the contrary! "By which he acknowledges his own inferiority and the power of the deity." We may be children of All Father; we may even trace our lineage back to Him but we are not Gods. The most that we can aim to become is a God-Man but we are still separate from the Gods and owe our existence to them along with all that we have and are. The adjectives that are relevant in the above passage are "subordinate", "submissive", "subject" and "obedient". These are not popular words in 21st century England which is plagued by the concepts of equality and torments itself over racial equality, gender equality and rights for homosexuals. Our ancestors did not focus on 'rights' but duty, honour and loyalty without which a folk cannot exist.

My readers will note something else very important that Tacitus writes in Germania 9: " At a set time, deputations from all the tribes of the same stock gather in a grove" or "At a set time, the peoples who share that name and bloodline send embassies to assemble in a forest". Our religion was NEVER universalist. It was always a religion of Blut und Boden or blood and soil and the universalists would do well to ponder that historical fact!

One may ask what is the difference in this attitude and that of the Abrahamic religions which focus on submission to their god? The difference is not so much in attitude but how we come to the Gods to begin with. All forms of Germanic heathenism stress that we do not seek to 'convert' others and certainly never by force unlike the desert religions. THIS is the key difference but I see no reason why we should accord less honour to the deities of our folk and race than the monotheists grant to their alien and universalist god. The Gods should not be viewed just as archetypes but as very real spiritual entities by which we are bound by our very existence. As a folk we cannot survive without them for they are our life source but they too need us for we are reminded of the expression "every race has its soul and every soul its race".


Friday, April 28, 2017

The Survival of the Germanic Caste System in Late Mediaeval Rural England

One subject which I keep returning to on this blog and on my Celto-Germanic Culture, Myth and History blog is that of the ancient Germanic caste system which survived in a debased form down to the late Middle Ages in England but certainly has its roots in deep Aryan antiquity. I am and always have been fascinated by the past and recently this has extended to the almost addictive subjects of genealogy and genetics. As I have indicated before on this blog shortly after retiring I took up the hobby of genealogy and was most fortunate in finding that my paternal grandmother's ancestry was already well researched as it is rooted in the old farming communities of North Meols in Lancashire for hundred of years. Parish records for this area are fairly well transcribed and freely available online and many of my ancestors even in the 1400s-1600s had published wills which aids in the research. Quite a few of them are referred to in local history books.

Whilst studying and engaging in genealogy it becomes apparent that the caste system in a debased form certainly in the rural areas of England survived long after it disappeared in the emerging towns and cities of the Industrial Revolution. As my readers will be aware tradition lingers far longer in the villages and smaller country towns of England than in the larger towns and cities which became a chaos of peoples. We see this to an extreme extent in the cesspits and hell holes of cities such as London and Birmingham where a plethora of languages are spoken and the native English are a minority or are fast becoming one. This is thankfully not reflected in the villages and rural towns although the political enemies of the people would have it be otherwise!

The Germanic caste system of Jarl, Karl and Thrall is still evident in rural England in the 1400s-1700s. Most of my grandmother's ancestors were farmers, some yeomen, some husbandmen although the distinction between yeomen and husbandmen disappeared by the beginning of the 19th century where both classes were described as farmers, an indication of the final breakdown of the caste system and the spread of the Industrial Revolution which destroyed the old Germanic world. The descriptor of yeoman is found in the Last Will and Testaments of many of my ancestors. Some of the earlier Wills were written in very flowery language with many references to Jesus Christ and the Resurrection! Such language quickly became phased out and replaced by more legally acceptable terminology as time advanced but nevertheless makes for fascinating reading!

In rural England we see four main categories of social position-the gentleman, the yeoman, the husbandman and the labourer. These categories were not rigid and there was intermarriage between the daughters and younger sons of the gentry and the more wealthy yeomen as there was between the more wealthy husbandmen and the yeomanry. So individuals over several generations could rise and fall between these classes or castes until the beginnings of the Industrial revolution and the emerging capitalist mercantile classes. Indeed I was able to trace a line of decent from the gentry to the yeomanry in the 17th century and thus I was able to take my ancestry back to the 12th century and further back still. We are then reliant upon historical chronicles, many of which are full of contradictions. History if you go far enough back merges into legend and then back into myth which makes the subject even more fascinating and compelling!

What is clear to me is that the Germanic caste system survived the brutal onslaught of xtianity but it was the industrial age which finally sounded its death knell which should come as no surprise to us as this process is continuing to the present day where not only has the caste system has broken down but we are beginning to see the dissolution of the races. Order is giving way to chaos. Light is giving way to darkness but it will not always be so!

Let us now examine the division of late mediaeval rural English society:

Landed Gentry- The gentleman is a landowner who lived entirely from rental income without having to engage in work himself. The gentleman is a step down from the titled aristocrat but often the gentry could trace their ancestry from the nobility via younger sons and daughters. They in essence were the Lords of the Manor. They were part of what is now termed the Upper Class in England. I stress in England as the American class system is based entirely upon income not on occupation and/or breeding as the English one which is a hollow and debased echo of the Germanic caste system.
The wealth of the gentry was greatly depleted by the agricultural depression of the 1870s. The gentry also consisted of esquires and knights and thus equated to the Germanic caste of Jarl.

Yeomanry-The yeoman held less land than the gentleman. He either owned the freehold of the land or was a larger scale leaseholder and employed people to work for him but unlike the gentleman he was a working farmer. He was regarded as being one step down from the gentleman but superior in status to the husbandman although these boundaries were quite fluid. Often the yeoman would have additional responsibilities such as Overseer of the Poor, Constable, Church Warden and Juror. A Juror would serve on juries (as the term suggests!) and would vote for the Knight of the Shire.  I managed to find some of my ancestors who occupied these additional positions. Another position could be that of Bailiff or Bridge Warden. Some of my ancestors in the 1400s were 'guardians of the hedge', from the old surname Heyward which eventually transmuted into Howarth and Howard etc. Wealthier husbandmen could also occupy some of these positions. The yeoman is similar in position to the earlier franklin of the 1100s to 1400s. He was the freeman, neither noble nor serf. As a military class they were positioned after the knight and squire but above the page. The yeoman bridged the gap between the nobility and peasantry and were the middle class of their time. Again I use this term in the English and not the American sense. The etymology of yeoman is interesting and may derive either from the Old English iunge man (young man)  or the Old Frisian gaman, meaning 'rustic' or 'villager'. In ancient times the yeoman was the protector of the nobility, a warrior. The husbandman was a step down from the yeoman but closely associated in function. They were working farmers but had much less land but enough to support a family. However in feudal times the husbandman would have been classed as a serf rather than a freeman so his position is intermediate between the yeomanry and the working labourers. The yeomanry thus equated to the Germanic caste of Karl. However in early times the Yeoman certainly had martial responsibilities.

Labourers-The labourer or cottager was a step below the husbandman and in feudal times was not regarded as being a freeman but a serf, tied legally to the Lord of the Manor. It should be emphasised here that a serf is not a slave. This is a common misconception. He enjoyed many rights and freedoms but as a bonded tenant he needed his master's permission to leave the land. They would have equated to the Germanic caste of Thrall. They were the working class of the day. Again I use the English and not the American definition of the term. The debased and materialist American 'class' system has no basis in the Germanic caste system but is based purely on levels of income and pays no heed to a person's education, occupation, family background or ancestry. Indeed it is possible for an individual in a single lifetime to move up and down this base system! It is very important that I stress this for the ancient Germanic caste system is more to do with function than wealth or income. Indeed it is a reflection of the cosmic order and the tripartite functional division of the Gods.

As I mentioned earlier the Industrial Revolution, a harbinger of global capitalism sounded the death knell of the ancient Germanic caste system and the traditional English rural way of life. This process is continuing to the present day. The Industrial Revolution supposedly brought 'progress' in its wake and the eventual 'emancipation' of women. In reality it enslaved the masses and thrust the woman into the mechanised working place-the factories. Man thus became a wage slave. Undoubtedly this is far worse than the Norman feudal system or the earlier Germanic caste system. Germanic man became uprooted from his natural environment-the rural village. He became cut off from his natural roots, unable to determine who his ancestors were and with it came a loss of identity. This is the curse of the abomination known as the city, the cesspit, the multiracial soup of the 21st century.

With the 'emancipation' of women and the woman's 'right to choose' chaos and family breakdown is rife in modern England. In becoming supposedly 'free' woman has become like man a slave, a slave to the mechanised work place of factory, office and shop. Consequently the following Aryan prophecy was fulfilled:

"Out of the corruption of women proceeds the confusion of castes; out of the confusion of castes proceeds the loss of memory, out of the loss of memory proceeds the loss of understanding, and out of this all evil." (Bhagavad Gita 1:41)

This prophecy is remarkably similar to the following one taken from Table 12, 2nd Chapter, 11 of  the Book of Sajaha:

"Customs will no longer be enforced, but vice will be fashionable. Men will have sexual intercourse with boys and go unpunished; women will no longer want to be women, but will behave like men and go unpunished; people will mix themselves with animals and go unpunished and father bastards. And the bastards of bastards will be countless in the streets of the cities without anyone eradicating them." (Wotans Krieger's translation)

It is remarkable how accurately the Babylonian prophecy predicted the widespread plague of paedophilia, homosexuality, bestiality, feminism and miscegenation which are endemic in cities and larger towns than in more rural towns and villages where tradition still lingers on.

One day we will need to resurrect the ancient Germanic caste system when we have regained control of our land and we will have to start again at the beginning. The caste system is divinely ordained and as followers of the ancient Germanic Gods it is imperative that we seek to restore this system when the time eventually comes.

Tuesday, April 11, 2017

The Mark of the Beast and the Microchip

The 'Mark of the Beast' is coming and it is coming soon! From April of 2016 the British Government made it compulsory for all dogs to be microchipped to enable easy identification if parted from their owners or at least that is the official version of events. There are now also calls for cats to be microchipped too and one has to wonder what is really behind all of this?

The Book of Revelation whilst discussing the appearance of the 'Beast' or ' Antichrist' makes reference to the following:
"And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: and that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six." (Revelation 13: 16-18, AV)
Before this system can be introduced amongst the general human population it is necessary for it to be tested first on animals and for the technology to be evaluated. It is also necessary to soften up the masses so that they do not reject the technology and are persuaded to see its 'benefits'. People have been discussing this issue for a long time, particularly with the advent of computers and the bar code that we find on retail product packaging. More than likely the prophecy of Revelation 13 refers to the microchip which is so tiny that it can be injected under the skin and carry information about every aspect of our lives. Via the Internet everyone would be interconnected and there would be no need for passports, driving licences or bank cards. Even now there is talk of a 'cashless society', one of the biggest threats to our freedom to have emerged in millennia. A cashless society would give both governments and global corporations unprecedented access to our personal details. The Mark of the Beast just takes this one step further and is a means of bringing together all computer systems and databanks into one small chip that can be placed underneath our skin, enabling governments to track our every move and transaction. Those who reject this development will be eyed with suspicion with the well repeated mantra "what have you got to hide?" with privacy no longer being viewed as a very natural human desire and right. The fear of islamic terrorism, a situation which has been deliberately brought about by the New World Order will provide the necessary impetus for governments to advance this agenda. We have already seen the way in which encrypted information is being viewed with hostility and suspicion by governments, using the fear of terrorism as a justification to continue to curtail our basic everyday freedoms. Internet Service Providers are being placed under extreme pressure to co-operate with governments even when there is no real justification for doing so.

A Swedish company, Epicenter has already introduced microchipping for over 100 of its 700 employees. See It must be stressed here that the employees agreed to this and there is no suggestion of compulsion here but how long will it be before this sort of thing becomes common place and is eventually introduced by governments but for more sinister reasons? 

I note that in the following article the Daily Mail (a Conservative Party supporting newspaper) makes the allegation that there is no evidence of "an epidemic of cancer as a result" of microchipping dogs which I find a rather strange thing for them to say and "Microchips are so safe that they are now being used in humans, although rumours about state plans to microchip every citizen are exactly that: just mischievous rumours." How the Daily Mail is qualified to comment on the matter is beyond me and it is clearly acting as a mouthpiece for government propaganda in this case. See

In view of the efforts that the newspaper is going to to stress how 'harmless' microchipping is I note the following again from the Book of Revelation:

"And I heard a great voice out of the temple saying to the seven angels, Go your ways, and pour out the vials of the wrath of God upon the earth. And the first went, and poured out his vial upon the earth; and there fell a noisome and grevious sore upon the men which had the mark of the beast, and upon them which worshiped his image." (Revelation 16: 1-2, AV)

This is most clearly a form of cancer which breaks out upon those who have taken the 'mark' of the Beast which more than likely is the microchip which I have already referred to. As most of the population of the earth or at the very least in the 'developed world' will have accepted the 'mark' then the majority of the human population of the earth will perish which is exactly what will happen at Ragnarok when only a minority of the population will survive but I need to stress here that the cancer epidemic that will be caused by the 'mark' is only one aspect of the events related in the Book of Revelation.

Microchips have a longer history in the USA and various studies carried out on the microchipping of animals suggest that the longer a microchip is stored within an animal the greater the risk of developing cancer. This should be reflected upon as microchipping of dogs in the United Kingdom only goes back 1 year as far as it being a mandatory and thus mass exercise so it impossible for anyone to say that there is no risk. One should also bear in mind that human beings live far longer than most other animals so the risk of cancer developing in human beings will be proportionately greater and is the epidemic which Revelation refers to and warns us about. See

It is quite clear to me that the introduction of the mobile phone was a precursor to acclimatising human beings to carrying around a small piece of advanced technology on their persons, a microchipped device close to their body and we all know that overexposure to mobile phones can be harmful to our health. The microchip will be 'sold' to humans as an extension and development of this technology, meant to be 'helpful' to us and safeguard our 'security'. When governments persuade their populations to surrender some aspect of their liberty it is always on the basis of making us 'safer'. Nothing could be further from the truth. Smart phones ( I do not and never will own one) enable not just governments but all kinds of commercial organisations to track peoples' every movement. The Mark of the Beast will of course include that functionality and can be used to close off the finances of anyone found to be dissenting against the State and all kinds of 'fugitives' will be prevented from even buying food to live. We are already too reliant upon the State and its various institutions. No doubt this has been the long term plan, to make us all reliant for our very existence upon Big Brother, the New World Order, the Beast, whatever you wish to call it.

In addition to potentially causing cancer a microchip which has an electric current activated in it may also cause severe burning to the carrier. This is just one other aspect of the 'grevious sore' referred to in Revelation. At one time it was considered that the branding or the tattooing of the skin with the Mark of the Beast would be the means by which people took the 'mark' and this may indeed be so but with the easy injection of the microchip and the  massive amount of information which it can store it seems more plausible to me that it is the microchip which Revelation is intending here.

Back in 2008 the British Government did consider the microchipping of prisoners but the criticism that this proposal attracted from Probation Officers and civil rights groups caused them to shelve the idea but that won't necessarily prevent the idea from surfacing again.

It is also not beyond the bounds of possibility that the microchip will be used to physically control people and even influence their thoughts. The US Government has spent a lot of time and money on trialling various technologies to control human populations. Once the chip has been perfected I am sure that this will be yet one more aspect of it. Control of actions and thoughts of course are things which branding or tattooing cannot do!

I recommend that my readers also study the attached article which is quite illuminating! See

Sunday, April 09, 2017

USA, israel and the Pilgrim Fathers' Complex

It is abundantly clear to most unbiased individuals that zionist dominance of the USA is thorough and complete with the USA giving unconditional support to the terrorist state of israel no matter what crimes they commit against the native Arab population or surrounding countries. The occasional mild criticism of israel by the USA is merely a smoke screen to deflect accusations of its subservience to that State. One must rather ask oneself why? Why is the USA subservient to israel and what does israel hope to gain from its dominance of that super power?

My readers will know without me telling them that the USA regards itself as the global policeman but not only a policeman but a prosecutor, judge, jury and executioner as witnessed by the infamous and unjust Nuernberg trials after WWII. Other 'western' countries such as the United Kingdom are mere satellites, appendages of American hegemony. One only has to note the farcical way in which the British Government has changed its policy twice over Syria in the last 3 months, firstly supporting regime change prior to the election of Trump, then saying regime change was not necessary after Trump's election and now once again calling for regime change after the illegal attack by the USA against Syria a few days ago. This was a war crime for it was a military attack against a sovereign State WITHOUT a declaration of war, something which the USA accused Japan of doing in 1941! It is interesting that whilst the USA demands that every other country abides by international law it chooses not to do and indeed does not recognise any authority of the International Criminal Court over its territories and citizens. Its use of torture in Guantanamo Bay detention camp is an obvious example of its criminality and indeed Trump when campaigning as a presidential candidate is on record as saying that he was in favour of torture-that is the measure of the man who now presides over that super power. So much for the alleged lofty ideals and moral 'superiority' of the USA!

Not content with threatening Syria the British Government has now accused the Russian Government of complicity in the alleged attacks by President Assad against the supposed 'civilian' population. See Thus the UK is now in pet poodle fashion assisting the USA in cranking up the war fever against not only Syria, Russia's ally but Russia itself thus inviting further demonization of Putin as a prelude to the possible war to come. And who is to gain from the destruction of Syria and possibly Russia? Yes, you have guessed correctly, israel for Syria, Iran and Russia stand in the way of its intended goal of a Greater israel and we are not just talking about Palestine and Jordan here but the swallowing up of Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Oman, most of Turkey and parts of Egypt. If israel eventually succeeds in their goal then they would become the most powerful State on the face of the earth thus fulfilling zionist goals and biblical prophecy. As an aside I notice how Blogger seeks to 'correct' me whenever I decline to use a capital 'I' for israel and a capital 'Z' for not only zion and zionism but does not do so for the term 'Aryan' or 'Wodenism'. I wonder why? I will let my readers work that one out for themselves!

Now I have answered the second of the two questions raised in the first paragraph so let me now answer the first! Why does the USA support israel? In modern times we have seen the way in which the media and political system is dominated by zionists with plenty of cash to buy newspapers and broadcasting stations and bribe politicians but the real answer goes deeper than just money. The United States or rather the American colonies that became the USA were colonised initially by the Pilgrim Fathers, allegedly escaping persecution in 17th century England. They took with them their desert religion of xtianity, viewing themselves in the same dubious light as the jews who escaped Pharaoh and Egypt in the Exodus. See These Puritans relied heavily upon one of the most diabolical books ever written-the Old Testament which is full of the desert 'god' commanding the israelites to exterminate other nations in the land that they stole from native populations. Yes a 'god' who not only condones but demands genocide! This explains why they had no qualms in committing genocide against the Red Indians, confining the ones that survived to reservations-often land that had no monetary value. They in effect modelled themselves on the israelites of the Old Testament and behaved accordingly in appalling fashion.

The jewish Old Testament god demanded that all peoples become subservient to the israelites or they be utterly destroyed:

"When thou comest nigh unto a city to fight against it, then proclaim peace unto it. And it shall be, that all the people that is found therein shall be tributaries unto thee, and they shall serve thee. And if it will make no peace with thee, but will make war against thee, then thou shalt besiege it: and when the LORD thy God hath delivered it into thine hands, thou shalt smite every male thereof with the edge of the sword: but the women, and the little ones, and the cattle, and all that is in the city, even all the spoil thereof, shalt thou take unto thyself; and thou shalt eat the spoil of thine enemies, which the LORD thy God hath given thee. Thus shalt thou do unto all the cities which are far very far off from thee, which are not of the cities of these nations. But of the cities of these people, which the LORD thy God doth give thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth: but thou shalt utterly destroy them; namely, the Hittites, and the Amorites, the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites; as the LORD thy God hath commanded thee: that they teach you not to do after all their abominations, which they have done unto their gods; so should ye sin against the LORD your God." (Deuteronomy 20: 10-18, AV)

This policy of subjugation and genocide has not changed and the goal of a Greater israel requires a superior force and that force is the USA. Even today the USA is dominated not only by jewish zionists but xtian zionists as well who see in the restoration of the State of israel a sign that they are in the 'last days' prior to the second coming of their saviour so support for israel suits both parties but for obviously different reasons! However the power of this rogue State will be broken and the only power capable of doing so is Russia.

xtianity still today has an iron grip upon the white population of the USA despite it supposedly having a secular constitution. One even sees this amongst the 'white nationalist' community where even the most rabid anti-semites still cling to the coattails of their semitic religion, not seeing the obvious contradiction there! Many years ago I coined a phrase for this peculiar disposition, calling it the Pilgrim Fathers' Complex. One does not see this in England and the rest of northern Europe where xtianity is dying the natural death suggested by Adolf Hitler. More and more people are hearing the Call of the Gods and are returning to the Gods of their fathers. Hail Woden! Germania, not israel is our Holy Land!

Finally I would recommend that my readers take a close look at the flag of the State of israel. The flag was originally designed for the zionist movement in 1891, thus suggesting that the modern State of israel is indeed zionist or why would it adopt a zionist flag for their State? There is also a suggestion that the two blue stripes represent the rivers Nile and Euphrates rather than the jewish prayer shawl that the israelis claim it to be. The two rivers explanation makes far more sense to me than the official version. After all the whole point of public symbols is to appeal to the Unconscious mind, the Blood Memory, not the intellect. I would also like to add that the 'star of david' which appears at the centre of the flag was adopted as a zionist symbol by the First zionist  Congress in 1897. That self same Congress also adopted the hatikvah as their anthem, later becoming the national anthem of israel.

Saturday, April 08, 2017

Trump, Syria and the Beginning of Ragnarok

It is now becoming obvious after just 3 months in office that President Donald Trump is not all that he seems to be. Whilst denying that he was a 'politician' it has not taken him very long to learn their ways. Whilst a candidate on the campaign trail he continuously made negative comments and serious allegations about his primary opponent Clinton, threatening to 'send her to jail' if he was elected. Once elected within minutes he was seen praising and thanking Clinton and her contribution to public life. That should have been the first indication to his supporters that nothing has really changed-only the name of the man in charge. Trump repeatedly told his audiences that he wanted a better relationship with Putin and Russia, suggesting an alliance between the two powers to defeat ISIS but within weeks of being elected he created further tensions between the two powers by demanding that Putin relinquishes the Crimea, something that Putin cannot possibly do without losing credibility and power in his own country.

Trump also initially suggested that the USA should cease to seek regime change in Syria or anywhere else, acknowledging the failure of recent wars in the middle east and then within hours backtracks on this, condemns Assad and the Syrian government on an unproven and unlikely allegation that he used chemical weapons in an airstrike this week and went on to commit a war crime himself by bombing an Assyrian military facility, killing civilians including children. Either someone has got to Trump and is now pulling his strings or this is evidence of instability on the part of Trump. It is quite possible that this act of aggression was committed to demonstrate how 'strong' he is as a leader and to boost his public support. Politicians know and Trump IS now a politician, that when public support is low a war tends for some strange reason to reverse that and deflects attention away from problems within the country that they govern.

This flagrant breach of international war, this war crime (something the USA excels in) which will undoubtedly go unpunished has now done the unthinkable-the American media now appears to be on Trump's side and even the media in this country is salivating over this crime, failing to appreciate the hypocrisy in that an alleged Syrian war crime should be punished by a real and provable war crime by the USA, the self appointed global policeman, judge, jury and executioner (let's not forget the Nuernberg show trials after WWII!) Two crimes does not make a right! In addition to this new found support the pressure has lessened on Trump and he has demonstrated that he is not in 'cahoots' with Russia for now relations between the two countries have worsened even further than during the days of Obama.

Clearly the two driving forces for conflict with Russia and in the middle east are israel and the military industrial complex. War sells weapons. War makes the sellers of these weapons yet more wealthy. It is war and capitalism that drives the USA's international relations, nothing else and certainly not the false lofty ideals that it lies about, ideals that their politicians cannot practice in their own country, never mind enforce anywhere else. As a consequence of this act of aggression-let's call it what it is-a war crime (something that Germany was punished by the USA for) Russia has suspended its agreement over consultation with the USA regarding military exercises and war plane flights in Syria, leading to the very real possibility of localised conflict between these two powers within Syria. All it will take is a mid air collision between an American and a Russian plane or a terrorist 'rebel' shooting down an American plane and the blame being placed upon Russia and/or Syria. Furthermore with the USA so quick to respond to the alleged chemical attack this could further embolden the terrorist 'rebels' to stage a fake chemical attack-not beyond their capability and further attacks will be launched by Trump against Syria. The USA has intimated that they are considering further military actions. With a now proven trigger happy television personality in the White House who has spilled his first blood one can only speculate how events may escalate with a Third World War now looking more likely than at any other time since the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962!

Even if tensions do not escalate between the USA and Russia Trump seems to have forgotten that it is Syria, not the USA who is on the frontline against the war against ISIS and this attack by the USA could cause a setback in Syria's struggle with the very real possibility of the black flag being hoisted in Damascus. If that happens then we will witness a renewed struggle between the forces of militant Islamism and the 'west', the RAGNAROK-KORANGAR which has been predicted and the end of the Age. Let us also remember that ISIS is the direct creation of the USA in its quest for unending war. This is the reason why the USA was created to begin with, a country formed by genocide and the only country to have used nuclear weapons in a war crime committed against Japan in WWII.

The astute observer will notice the white, red and black colours of eternal Germania which appear in the Syrian flag, a flag so hated by the zionists.

Wednesday, April 05, 2017

British Government to Force State Employees to Swear Oath of Allegiance to 'British Values'

Asian Communities Minister Sajid Javid is proposing that all elected officials such as MPs and Councillors along with State employees such as Civil Servants and Local Government Officers should swear an oath of allegiance to his government's interpretation of 'British Values'. Not content with compelling politicians to subscribe to his party's version of what constitutes 'British Values'  he also wishes to compel those who work for the state, who are by definition politically neutral servants of the Government to do likewise, setting a dangerous precedent for the neutrality of Crown Servants. Javid is clearly of the opinion that unless one subscribes to his vision of 'British Values' one cannot work effectively for one's political masters which is of course an absurd view point. In addition to the aforementioned officials the oath may also be extended to workers of the NHS and the BBC!

Let's take a look at what these so-called 'British Values' are. According to Ofsted they are:

. Democracy.

. The rule of law.

. Individual liberty.

. Mutual respect for and tolerance of those with different faiths and beliefs and for those without faith.

I don't need to tell my readers that the British Government has failed miserably on each of these four core 'values'. The way in which they have illegally spied on large segments of the population for decades and clamped down on any opposition by native English people to the ongoing depopulation and genocide of our people by the State demonstrates their lack of adherence to their much vaunted so-called 'values'. There is no 'Individual liberty' in England today where every word spoken or written is subject to the monitoring of the State, censure and prosecution.

It is clear to me that the Government is now desperate. Multiculti Britain is falling apart at the seams and islamic terrorism is now stalking  the streets of this land (Ragnarok-Korangar) , the like of which has not been seen since the days of the IRA. This initiative launched by Javid is the softer side of a two pronged attack, the harder side launched last year by Amber Rudd, the rather angry and stony faced Home Secretary. We truly are experiencing now the horror that was originally predicted by George Orwell.

Whilst I am no friend of xtianity I can understand how many xtians who subscribe to traditional values have cause for alarm by this move. It is apparent that this move by the Government is the result of an independent review carried out by Dame Louise Casey who has been labelled as the 'Integration Csar'. Casey according to the The Christian Institute is a supporter of homosexual 'marriage' and has stated that "saying that marriage is only between one man and one woman goes against British values" and that opposition to this bolshevic and unnatural institution in Roman Catholic schools "is not okay either- it is not how we bring children up in this country." So again we have this time not even an elected politician but a BUREAUCRAT determining not only what constitutes 'British Values' but has the temerity to dictate to parents and teachers how children should be raised! So it would seem that 'democracy', the 'rule of law', 'individual liberty' and 'respect and tolerance for difference' only apply if you agree with liberal politics which is exactly what modern Conservatives are-liberals. Any departure from these predetermined 'values' which have been formulated by an unelected elite is regarded as heresy and punishable by all kinds of persecution and prosecution.

If the Government is successful in forcing through this initiative (the unions appear to be silent about this- I wonder why?) then people with traditional values will be excluded from public life. I wonder if Casey and Javid have compared this to the way in which those who opposed National Socialism in Germany were likewise excluded from public life? I am not referring to jews here just people who did not agree with National Socialism. What if any is the qualitative difference between that and what is being proposed today in 21st century England?

The teaching of this political propaganda is now part of the curriculum taught in State schools. I wonder how long it will be before schoolchildren and other general citizens will be compelled to take this heinous oath?